XZ18 vs ME18-2
Two sizes of the same frame. The difference that decides the order is usually aisle width or the weight of a full pallet — not the number on the plate.
| XZ18 | ME18-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Model | XZ18 | ME18-2 |
| Rated capacity | 1.8 t | 1.8 t |
| Engine | Yanmar 3TNV70, 10.3 kW | Yanmar 3TNV70, 10.3 kW |
| Max dig depth | 2686 mm | 2686 mm |
| Bucket | 0.07 m³ | 0.07 m³ |
| Length | 3516 mm | 3516 mm |
| Width | 1255 mm | 1255 mm |
| Operating weight | 1.8 t | 1.8 t |
| operatingWeight | 1.2 t | 1.2 t |
| bucketCapacity | 0.05 m³ | 0.05 m³ |
| digDepth | 2374 mm | 2374 mm |
| engine | Yanmar 3TNV70, 10.3 kW | Yanmar 3TNV70, 10.3 kW |
| width | 1150 mm | 1150 mm |
| tailSwing | Zero tail swing | Zero tail swing |
| transportLength | 3144 mm | 3144 mm |
Rows that differ are marked. Rows without a mark are identical on both builds.
Choose XZ18 when
1.8 t long undercarriage. The longer track makes the machine stable enough to lift a concrete ring without tipping forward.
The building is the constraint: floor loading, door width, or a mezzanine that will not take the heavier chassis. XZ18 is also the cheaper unit, so a fleet that never loads to the plate should not pay for the frame it does not use.
XZ18 specificationChoose ME18-2 when
1.8 t standard undercarriage. Same engine as XZ18, shorter footprint, cheaper to move between sites.
The load is the constraint: pallets that arrive over-weight, attachments that shift the centre of gravity forward, or a mast tall enough that residual capacity falls away at height. Buying one size up is cheaper than a second handling step.
ME18-2 specificationNot sure which one
Send the aisle width, the load and the lift height. We answer with the model and the reason, not both brochures.