ME25 vs ME35
Two sizes of the same frame. The difference that decides the order is usually aisle width or the weight of a full pallet — not the number on the plate.
| ME25 | ME35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Model | ME25 | ME35 |
| Rated capacity | 2.5 t | 3 t |
| Engine | Kubota V1505, 18.2 kW | Yanmar 4TNV88, 22.4 kW |
| Max dig depth | 3050 mm | 3310 mm |
| Bucket | 0.08 m³ | 0.09 m³ |
| Length | 3950 mm | 4260 mm |
| Width | 1378 mm | 1465 mm |
| Operating weight | 2.5 t | 3.0 t |
| operatingWeight | 1.2 t | 1.2 t |
| bucketCapacity | 0.05 m³ | 0.05 m³ |
| digDepth | 2374 mm | 2374 mm |
| engine | Yanmar 3TNV70, 10.3 kW | Yanmar 3TNV70, 10.3 kW |
| width | 1150 mm | 1150 mm |
| tailSwing | Zero tail swing | Zero tail swing |
| transportLength | 3144 mm | 3144 mm |
Rows that differ are marked. Rows without a mark are identical on both builds.
Choose ME25 when
2.5 t. The largest model that still tows behind a 3.5 t pickup in most markets.
The building is the constraint: floor loading, door width, or a mezzanine that will not take the heavier chassis. ME25 is also the cheaper unit, so a fleet that never loads to the plate should not pay for the frame it does not use.
ME25 specificationChoose ME35 when
3.0 t. Steps up to a wider track and a larger pump; the difference is felt in cycle time, not in dig depth.
The load is the constraint: pallets that arrive over-weight, attachments that shift the centre of gravity forward, or a mast tall enough that residual capacity falls away at height. Buying one size up is cheaper than a second handling step.
ME35 specificationNot sure which one
Send the aisle width, the load and the lift height. We answer with the model and the reason, not both brochures.